|
|
Enron Mail |
Dan,
Did you ever receive an electronic copy of this guaranty format? brant -----Original Message----- From: Brant Reves Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 5:34 PM To: Sara Shackleton; Dan J Hyvl Subject: Re: Glencore Sara, I just spoke with David P. Do you have an electronic copy that you can forward to Dan Hyvl? thanks brant Brant Reves 02/23/2001 11:14 AM To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Glencore << OLE Object: StdOleLink << Sara, Here is a credit worksheet detailing the changes we should include in the ISDA amendment. << File: Glencore Amendment.xls << Dan, I am forwarding by interoffice mail (i do not have an electronic copy) a physical/financial guaranty for your review. As of now, they do not transact with Enron in the physical markets, but they may in the future. Please review... thanks brant Sara Shackleton 02/23/2001 09:48 AM To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Glencore ENA will review CP's form of guaranty and comment; Brant will circulate guaranty to a physical lawyer and advise him that financial is also reviewing. I spoke with David Porter and we have decided to amend the ISDA to acknowledge that all three branches can transact under the existing Glencore Ltd. master agreement. The use of several different corporate designations (Ltd., SA, AG) is confusing CP's trading partners in the U.S. Click on this link to view the document in the Financial Trading Agreements database--< << OLE Object: StdOleLink <<
|