Enron Mail

From:awaskow@exchange.ml.com
To:sara.shackleton@enron.com
Subject:RE: Master Repurchase Agreement with Enron North America Corp.
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Wed, 1 Nov 2000 07:22:00 -0800 (PST)

Sara,

When you are ready to talk some more about the agreement, please give me a
call. Thanks.

--Andy

Andrew V. Waskow
Vice President and Counsel
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
4 World Financial Center, Floor 12
New York, NY 10080
Phone: 212-449-5828
Fax: 212-449-0265
awaskow@exchange.ml.com


< -----Original Message-----
< From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [SMTP:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
< Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 9:37 AM
< To: AWaskow@exchange.ml.com
< Subject: RE: Master Repurchase Agreement with Enron North America
< Corp.
<
<
< Andy:
<
< I am reviewing your comments and will have an answer shortly. I thought,
< however, that you should know that the limitation of liability provision
< is
< non-negotiable from Enron's viewpoint. If this is problematic, please
< advise and we can halt further discussion. Thanks. Sara
<
<
<
<
< "Waskow, Andrew
<
< (OGC)" To:
< "'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'" <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com<
< <AWaskow@exchan cc: "Shin, Regina (OGC)"
< <Rshin@exchange.ml.com<
< ge.ml.com< Subject: RE: Master
< Repurchase Agreement with Enron North America
< Corp.
<
< 10/31/2000
<
< 06:33 PM
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
< Sara:
<
< Thanks for the additional information and the recommended changes, each of
< which we accept.
<
< In order to accommodate the deletion of 9(b), we recommend revising your
< number 6 to read as follows:
<
< 6. Substitution
<
< (a) Paragraph 9(b) is hereby deleted in its entirety.
<
< (b) Seller shall not retain custody of any Purchased Securities
< under any Transaction governed by this Agreement.
<
< NOTICES: Your suggested language regarding notices is potentially
< problematic. Under the Paragraph 13 of the MRA, notices may made orally,
< "to be confirmed promptly in writing....", and confirmation of delivery is
< not expressly relevant. The unquestionable ability to make oral margin
< calls pursuant to Paragraph 4 is vital in fast-moving market conditions,
< and
< was expressly included in the standard agreement to avoid any doubt as to
< their validity. In the default context (Paragraph 11), proof of delivery
< of
< written notice is of no concern because the exercise of a party's rights
< under that Paragraph is not contingent upon delivery of notice. Notice
< must
< be given "as promptly as practicable." We believe that the proposed
< language could cause confusion or uncertainty regarding the validity of
< oral
< margin calls and would conflict with the operative provisions of Paragraph
< 11. We therefore request deletion of your number 8.
<
< NON-ASSIGNABILITY: As we discussed earlier today, we have a general
< aversion to assignments of repurchase transactions due to our regulatory
< obligations as a broker-dealers. For that reason, we must be free to
< withhold consent to assignment with confidence that such withholding will
< not be challenged as "unreasonable." We therefore request deletion of
< your
< number 9.
<
< We are still reviewing your proposals regarding SETOFF and LIMITED
< LIABILITY. I will also have to review Section 5-1401 of the NYGOL before
< commenting on that.
<
< I look forward to the prompt completion of our negotiations. Thanks again
< for the information and recommendations.
<
< Best regards,
< Andy Waskow
<
< < -----Original Message-----
< < From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [SMTP:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
< < Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 6:22 PM
< < To: awaskow@exchange.ml.com
< < Cc: Ellen.Su@enron.com
< < Subject: Master Repurchase Agreement with Enron North America Corp.
< <
< < Andy:
< <
< < In the spirit of "full disclosure", I thought I would let you know what
< < ENA
< < has agreed to on the ISDA side with various Merrill entities.
< < ENA has ISDA's with Merrill Lynch International Bank (8/25/95), Merrill
< < Lynch Capital Services Inc. (12/2/92) and Merrill Lynch International
< < (8/25/95).
< < There is no arbitration provision in any of these agreements; there is
< < merely silence as to jurisdiction (ENA began negotiating arbitration
< < around
< < 1997). All of these agreements contain our standard limitation of
< < liability language (in boldface) and all permit some type of assignment
< to
< < an affiliate (in general, without negative tax impact or with sufficient
< < credit support). All of the agreements provide for setoff (including
< < affiliates of non-defaulting parties) and all contain confidentiality
< < provisions.
< <
< < I would therefore propose the following changes to Annex I:
< <
< < change the margin deadline time to 10:00 a.m. (NY time)
< < delete Par 9(b) - and you can send your additional no custody required
< < language
< < delete the arbitration provision in its entirety
< <
< < I hope that you can resond to the remaining issues tomorrow morning so
< < that
< < we can finalize docs by the afternoon. Thanks for your assistance.
< <
< < Sara
< <
< <
< <
<
<
<
<