Enron Mail

From:janine.juggins@enron.com
To:stephen.douglas@enron.com
Subject:Re: Instinet Corporation
Cc:sara.shackleton@enron.com, jordan.mintz@enron.com
Bcc:sara.shackleton@enron.com, jordan.mintz@enron.com
Date:Mon, 11 Sep 2000 01:42:00 -0700 (PDT)

Sara,
we are currently working with John to establish a corporate structure for
equities trading out of London. I am due to meet with him today or tomorrow
so will follow up on these particular trades.
Regards
Janine


To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Instinet Corporation

Thanks for being on top of this. As I mentioned in my voice mail to you on
Friday, no trader should conclude a transaction on behalf of ENA while
located in a foreign country. On several discrete occasions we have
sanctioned exceptions to this rule but each such case had unique facts that
permitted us to conclude that those transactions were OK. Further, any
physical presence by ENA is a foreign country is generally a bad idea because
it supports a foreign tax authority's argument that ENA is doing business in
their country. Thus, because of that general concern, no Instinet terminal
should be put in place on behalf of ENA in a foreign country (especially
since for what purpose would such a thing be used - trading?) but, rather, an
appropriate foreign affiliate of Enron should contract for such service (in
this respect, you should speak with Janine Juggins in our London tax group -
Janine is our resident trading tax expert in London and will be very familiar
with the things described in this E-mail). I will be out of the country this
week (returning the week of the 18th) and can be reached at the Vancouver
Hotel in Vancouver, British Columbia. Best regards. Steve.


From: Sara Shackleton on 09/08/2000 04:46 PM
To: John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Instinet Corporation

John: I hear that you are trying to trade in the name of Enron North America
Corp. while you sit in London. Althought both ECT Investments, Inc. and
Enron North America Corp. have agreements with Instinet Corporation, those
companies are all U.S. companies without any presence in the U.K. (those
companies do not pay U.K. taxes!) I have asked the ENA tax lawyers to review
the implications of your proposed activity. I will try to speak with you
Monday before things go too far. Please provide an immediate response and
copy the tax lawyers noted above. Thanks. Sara