![]() |
Enron Mail |
I am preparing a more complete assessment of the entire transactions, but I'd
like to articulate one potentially critical point (that Treasa and I were just discussing). Problem: If we are to confirm the price risk management component (leg) of the transaction (WTI swap) under the existing Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc., please be aware that Morgan Stanley would have the contractual right to margin Enron for any positive incremental MTM value associated with this trade. The contract contains a collateral threshold of $15MM; however, our current exposure is approximately $130MM out-of-the-money with Enron currently posting in excess of $110MM in cash and L/Cs. Consequently, any incremental MTM in Morgan Stanley's favor would require the posting of margin in that amount. For example, for the transaction contemplated, a $5 decline in the forward price curve would equate to incremental margin requirement of $80MM (assuming 16MM Bbl volume). From a credit management standpoint, I have no objections. However, the potentially significant margining requirements may undermine the funding objective of your structure. Solution: One solution would be to confirm this trade under the above-referenced master trading contract (not an ISDA), but exclude this transaction for margining purposes. Both parties would retain setoff rights; and since our existing positions are grossly out-of-the-money, it is very unlikely that Enron would incur any incremental credit risk due to the transaction. Rod
|