Enron Mail

From:sara.shackleton@enron.com
To:robert.bruce@enron.com
Subject:FX Transactions
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Fri, 11 Aug 2000 10:54:00 -0700 (PDT)

----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000 04:22 PM -----

Trena McFarland
08/10/2000 10:04 AM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Lowry/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FX Transactions

file attached below
---------------------- Forwarded by Trena McFarland/LON/ECT on 10/08/2000
16:06 ---------------------------


Jon Barrett@MGLTD
07/08/2000 11:46
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Trena McFarland/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin Rhodes/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD, Sid
Tipples/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD, Alfred Pennisi/NYC/MGUSA@MGUSA, Andrew
Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: FX Transactions

We received the attached from Sullivan & Cromwell re the FX business and the
possibilities of using a US companyn which company to use for contract
purposes. At a meeting here at MG today, the consensus/preference was not to
use a UK company as we have no full ISD (chapter 10) firm nor the wish to
change MG's status.

Per the advice from S&C, we like the idea of using a US corporation with a UK
"arranger" to cover any UK regulatory issues that arise. Dependent on where
the business will end up (I understand to be discussed by Gary Hickerson/Mike
Hutchinson 18th August), the following appears to be the among the logical
solutions:

1. Contractual entity - either Enron North America, MG London Inc or Newco
Inc.
2. Arranger - either EEFT Ltd, Metallgesellschaft Ltd or MG Brokers Ltd
(depending on the effect on their chapter 3 status for the last two).

The current customer base consists of entities in the US, Canada, France, UK
and Switzerland.

Please advise on any group/tax issues that can affect the final decision. If
you need any further information, please let me know.

Many thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Jon Barrett/MGLTD_London/MGLTD on
07/08/2000 15:59 ---------------------------


GILBERGD@sullcrom.com on 06/08/2000 15:45:55
To: jbarrett
cc: RAISLERK@sullcrom.com

Subject: FX Transactions



eSafe Protect Gateway (tm) has scanned this mail for viruses, vandals and
suspicious attachments and has found it to be CLEAN.

File: 62cy01!.DOC (38,400 bytes)
Encoding: Base64
Result: Clean.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Attached is a draft of the memo we discussed on the proposed FX business.
Please call or e-mail with any questions. Best regards.


----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

- 62cy01!.DOC