|
|
Enron Mail |
Susan: How about any of Wednesday - Friday, Nov.8, 9 or 10? Houston is on
Central Std. Time. Let me know. Sara "Susan Hopkinson" <susan.hopkinson@lovells.com< 11/03/2000 05:38 AM To: <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com< cc: <Michael.Moulton@enron.com<, <Stephanie.Panus@enron.com< Subject: Re: SITA CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your email Sara.? When would you like to do the conference call next week? I cannot do Monday, but any other time should be fine. Maybe if you give me a couple of times that suit you then I can picko ne?? I would like my colleague Sharon Lewis to be free as well if possible. ? Susan ? <<< <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com< 11/3/2000 01:33:15 <<< Susan:? Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.? We have agreed to delete the CSA and will return a blackline to you shortly.? You may recall that SITA expressly requested that theE nron agreement be governed by English law which is why we prepared thisd ocument for execution by our affiliate in London with the jurisdictionl anguage appearing in the prior draft.? There are still issues posed by your markup and we should be able to schedule a conference call next week.? Thanks.? Sara ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????? "Susan Hopkinson"???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????? ??????????????????? <susan.hopkinson@lo??????? To:???? <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com<?????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????? vells.com<???????????????? cc:?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????? Subject:???? SITA???????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????? 10/09/2000 03:27 AM???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????? CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Further to my fax of 3 October we have SITA's instructions. 1 - Credit Support Annex : SITA's position is unchanged. SITA does not wish to have a Credit Support Annex.? SITA have asked that ENRON come up with a proposal on the term and volume of the transactions on the basis of no Credit Support Annex. 2 - SITA does not provide investment services ancillary to its main activities. Do you have any news regarding ENRON on this point? Kind regards Susan Hopkinson ---------------------------------------------------------------- Lovells (the merged firm of Lovell White Durrant and Boesebeck Droste, practising as Lovells Boesebeck Droste in some jurisdictions) is an international lawf irm. In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please contact the sender or the London Technology Department on +44 (0) 20 7296 2000. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Lovells (the merged firm of Lovell White Durrant and Boesebeck Droste, practising as Lovells Boesebeck Droste in some jurisdictions) is an international law firm. In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please contact the sender or the London Technology Department on +44 (0) 20 7296 2000.
|