Enron Mail

From:sara.shackleton@enron.com
To:christian.yoder@enron.com, stewart.rosman@enron.com
Subject:Re: merced
Cc:mark.taylor@enron.com
Bcc:mark.taylor@enron.com
Date:Fri, 1 Sep 2000 05:41:00 -0700 (PDT)

The ISDA Master does not circumscribe the trade term or trade parameters.
The issue which we discussed is authority. The Merced resolution of March
16, 1999 specifically authorizes the general manager "...to develop and
provide appropriate information, and certifications for completing Master
Trading (ISDA) Agreements with energy vendors and execute Master Trading
(ISDA) Agreements and appropriate vendor Schedules to the ISDA Agreement for
the purpose of acquiring energy and stabilizing energy costs. Such
executions are subject to Counsel review of the agreement and schedules as to
form." There is no specific mention of authority to enter into transactions
(by Merced's traders).
Intuitively one could draw the conclusion that the ISDA Master contemplates
transactions, Merced authorized the ISDA Master and therefore Merced
authorized transactions under the ISDA Master. Since Merced is a
governmental entity, the safer view is that we should not assume that Merced
authorized transactions. Merced probably intended to authorize transactions,
and if so, should not have an issue with specifically providing a clarifying
resolution.
Sara




Christian Yoder
09/01/2000 11:22 AM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: merced

Does our ISDA with Merced contain wording that gives us legal comfort if we
do an 18 month trade?---cgy
---------------------- Forwarded by Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT on 09/01/2000
09:17 AM ---------------------------
From: Stewart Rosman on 09/01/2000 08:13 AM
To: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: merced

You need to call Jim Day 916-441-0131 to discuss any authority issues
concerning Merced trades. He can discuss charter particulars.

Stewart