![]() |
Enron Mail |
Do you agree?
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/26/2000 01:12 PM --------------------------- John L Nowlan 10/26/2000 12:55 PM To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Liquids Limits Oct.25 Jeff this is no violation at all. These are arbitrary limits that were put in to give us a feel for where our exposure is. We have just changed the methodology of these,so the big move in the product numbers. To: Christian LeBroc/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Liquids Limits Oct.25 Is this a violation, or are we just shifting portfolios around. Jeff From: Christian LeBroc @ ENRON 10/26/2000 10:58 AM To: Hugo Moreira/LON/ECT@ECT, David J Botchlett/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Chismar/SIN/ECT@ECT, John Buckner Thomas/SIN/ECT@ECT, Scott Earnest/HOU/ECT@ECT, Risk Controls@ECT, Mary Thambiah/LON/ECT@ECT, Oliver Gaylard/LON/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Manfred Roenz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lee Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Homan Amiry/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Fondren/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Swinney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Horn/LON/ECT@ECT, Michelle Bruce/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Liquids Limits Oct.25
|