Enron Mail

From:marchris.robinson@enron.com
To:richard.shapiro@enron.com, steve.montovano@enron.com,james.steffes@enron.com, harry.kingerski@enron.com, david.fairley@enron.com
Subject:Duke Decision
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Fri, 29 Sep 2000 07:59:00 -0700 (PDT)

Enron gets a win in Florida. Let me know if you want a copy of the revised
opinion.

Marchris


----- Forwarded by Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron on 09/29/2000 02:53 PM -----

"Bill L. Bryant" <bill@katzlaw.com<
09/29/2000 09:51 AM

To: <mrobinso@enron.com<
cc: <Barton.Clark@enron.com<
Subject: Duke Decision


MR,

Yesterday, the Florida Supreme Court granted our Motion for Leave to Appear
as Amicus Curiae on Rehearing that we filed on Enron's behalf in theTampa
Electric Co. v. Garcia case. It also granted the relief we requested in
that Motion. The Court granted this relief despite the vehement protests by
Florida Power and Light and Florida Power Corporation that (1) Enron had no
standing or right to appear as an amicus curiae and (2) that the relief we
requested was unwarranted.

Technically, the Court characterized its order granting relief to Enron as
"granting the Motion for Leave to Appear as Amicus Curiae on Rehearing, and
denying the Incorporated Motion for Rehearing in light of the revised
opinion.." In short, there was no need to grant rehearing because, in its
revised opinion, the Court granted our relief. This was exactly what
Katherine Giddings (one of our appellate experts and co-counsel for Enron in
this matter) had predicted the Court would do if it granted our requested
relief.

A comparison of our requested language and the language included by the Court
in its opinion are identical. In its previous opinion, the Court made the
following statement: "The construction of any new electrical power
generating plant with a capacity greater than seventy-five megawatts is
required to be certified in accord with the various requirements of the
Siting Act in chapter 403, Florida Statutes." The Court's definition
appeared to broaden the class of electrical power generating facilities that
must be certified under the Siting Act because it failed to recognize
statutorily exempt utilities, i.e., under the statutes, only certain steam
and solar electrical generating facilities are subject to the Act - but the
Court's definition included "any" electrical power generating facility.

In our motion, we pointed out the Court's error and asked the Court to
clarify its definition by changing its statement to read: "The construction
of any new electrical power generating plant as defined by Section
403.503(12) that is not otherwise exempted by Florida law is required to be
certified in accord with the various requirements of the Siting Act in
chapter 403, Florida Statutes." The Court adopted this language verbatim,
adding only the words "Florida Statutes" after the reference to Section
403.503(12). In doing so, the Court recognized the merit of our argument.
In summary, the Court granted all relief we requested on Enron's behalf. The
relief requested by other parties in all other motions for rehearing,
including the PSC's, was denied in total.

Bill


_______________________________________

This transmission is intended to be delivered only to the named addressee(s)
and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, attorney
work-product or attorney-client privileged. If this information is received
by anyone other than the named addressee(s), the recipient should immediately
notify the sender by E-MAIL and by telephone (850) 224-9634 and obtain
instructions as to the disposal of the transmitted material. In no event
shall this material be read, used, copied, reproduced, stored or retained by
anyone other than the named addressee(s), except with the express consent of
the sender or the named addressee(s). Thank you.


Katz, Kutter Haigler, Alderman, Bryant & Yon et al
106 East College Avenue, Suite 1200
Tallahassee, FL 32301
(850) 224-9634

_______________________________________

This transmission is intended to be delivered only to the named addressee(s)
and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, attorney
work-product or attorney-client privileged. If this information is received
by anyone other than the named addressee(s), the recipient should immediately
notify the sender by E-MAIL and by telephone (850) 224-9634 and obtain
instructions as to the disposal of the transmitted material. In no event
shall this material be read, used, copied, reproduced, stored or retained by
anyone other than the named addressee(s), except with the express consent of
the sender or the named addressee(s). Thank you.