Enron Mail

From:howard.fromer@enron.com
To:jeffery.ader@enron.com, michael.brown@enron.com, mark.davis@enron.com,tom.dutta@enron.com, john.suarez@enron.com, doug.sewell@enron.com, richard.ring@enron.com, charles.decker@enron.com, john.llodra@enron.com, tom.may@enron.com, pearce.hammond@enron.c
Subject:NYISO to File Circuit Breaker Proposal with FERC today
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Wed, 16 May 2001 06:30:00 -0700 (PDT)

I am advised that at yesterday's ISO Board meeting, the ISO announced that it
would be filing with FERC today their circuit breaker proposal and tariff
language under section 205 as required by FERC's Order last week granting the
Mirant complaint, even though they will not have obtained ISO Committee
approval of these documents. That approval, required for a 205 filing, is
anticipated to occur at the special meeting of the Management Committee
that's been scheduled for May 23rd. My understanding is that the ISO intends
to ask FERC to expedite approval of the circuit breaker plan and tariffs by
June 13 but will not seek to have the circuit breaker applied prior to a
final FERC ruling.
IPPNY is likely to file tomorrow a response opposing the request for
expedited treatment. We should oppose this request as well. Clearly, the ISO
is making a mockery of FERC's remand of the circuit breaker back to the ISO
to get approval and resolve a number of issues that had been raised by
parties in the Mirant docket. However, those issues were only the tip of the
iceberg, as most parties treated the Mirant complaint as a challenge to the
ISO's authority to proceed without FERC approval and didn't raise substantive
concerns with the specifics of the ISO's circuit breaker proposal when they
filed in the Mirant docket. There are many such issues and parties thought
they would get discussed in the Committee review process that FERC had
clearly contemplated would occur.