![]() |
Enron Mail |
I would drop the "while we have not had an opportunity to review the policy
in detail.." phrase and simply start "We are..." I don't think we should lead with a qualification. Otherwise, looks great. Vance Meyer 05/17/2001 04:05 PM To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, Bernadette Hawkins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lora Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Terri Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Statement on Bush Policy Here is the statement we will be using regarding the Bush energy policy announcement today. If any of you have comments on it, let me know. Vance Meyer While we have not had an opportunity to review the policy in detail, we are encouraged that it is creating a healthy dialogue about energy solutions in the country. We are not a large generator, so our main interest as a marketer is in moving energy from where it is to where it is needed. Our expectation is that the Administration's policy will get the nation focused on how to make that happen through more open markets and transmission lines.
|