Enron Mail

From:aleck.dadson@enron.com
To:richard.shapiro@enron.com
Subject:RE: Lay/Harris Meeting
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:05:00 -0700 (PDT)

FYI
----- Forwarded by Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT on 06/15/2001 03:15 PM -----

Aleck Dadson
06/15/2001 03:05 PM

To: Rob Milnthorp/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON
cc: Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT
Subject: RE: Lay/Harris Meeting

Rob, just to reiterate one point Paul and I were trying to make on our
conference call - We both think it would be a mistake to delete from the
discussion with Harris et al our views regarding prices and resource
adequacy. The biggest political fear of the gov't going forward is that
consumers will see a big jump in prices once the market opens. For
instance, that fear underlies the suggestion that market opening should
await the return to service of the first Pickering A unit. - the idea (right
or wrong) is that Pickering will provide greater reliability and price
stability. The biggest fear of the government - based on our discussions
with the politicians and their advisors - is the prospect of headlines in
the Toronto Star et al about high prices in the IMO markets, whether or not a
rebate is ultimately payable down the road. They saw the problems that high
prices posed for Klein earlier this year and are fearful of being caught in
the same position. The Harris gov't is far more vulnerable than Klein ever
was. We are concerned that it is not an adequate answer to the gov't's
political concerns to say that high prices will simply increase the cashflow
to the government's own coffers (via OPG) to be redistributed at some later
date to Ontario electricity consumers. Remember that, in any event, the
MPMA rebate is calculated on the basis of annual revenues and that estimates
are that consumers may not see an MPMA payout until six months after the end
of the year. Our own extensive analysis and our own forward curves for
Ontario indicate that significant price increases (compared to the new OPG
bulk power rate of $48 MWh ) are unlikely. This is a reassuring assessment
and we think it is important to share that view with gov't. We can't rely
entirely on the existence of the mitigants; we have to address the underlying
concern about price spikes and high prices. We think we have a good story to
tell in that regard. Pleased to talk about this further. Aleck



Rob Milnthorp/ENRON@enronXgate
06/15/2001 10:16 AM

To: Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT
cc: Paul Devries/TOR/ECT@ECT
Subject: RE: Lay/Harris Meeting


Aleck/Paul - the attached looks good - much tighter message.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dadson, Aleck
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 7:39 AM
To: Milnthorp, Rob
Cc: Devries, Paul
Subject: Lay/Harris Meeting

Made your changes to the draft . The EOL figures had come from EOL in
Houston. Will have the Texas generation additions in MWs later today.
Lindsey has sent the revised speaking points and agenda to John
Lavorato/Kimberley Hillis. << File: Lay-Harris Agenda.doc << << File:
Outline of speaking point clean - r.doc <<