|
|
Enron Mail |
See below for email I sent about the tour. I have not heard back from anyone
in this group about the tour, so if it is going to occur, Greg Whalley would most likely want to participate and we need to arrange it with him. Steve, let me know if you want me to call Greg. Tom Briggs and John Shelk's emails to me about this for your information (the emails were not attached to the memo I sent to Louise, etal.) Thanks. ---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2001 05:15 PM --------------------------- From: Christi L Nicolay 06/28/2001 09:20 AM To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/Enron@EnronXGate, Andy Zipper/Enron@EnronXGate, John J Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Taylor/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark E Haedicke/Enron@EnronXGate, Elizabeth Sager/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeffrey T Hodge/Enron@EnronXGate cc: Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa Yoho/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Response to FERC: EOL Attached are the responses to the questions of FERC staff about EOL resulting from their visit earlier this month. I have used the revisions from Louise and incorporated comments from Bob Butts about the value at risk discussion. Mark Haedicke has reviewed this draft. I would like to send these to Kim Bruno at FERC later today. An additional FYI. Connie Lausten of the U.S. House Government Reform Committee made a request to Enron's DC office to see the trading floor operations in addition to holding a discussion about Enron Online. She is to meet with Dave Forster and Mark Taylor on Friday, July 13th at 9am. John Shelk from our DC office told me when people on the Hill say "Enron OnLine" they mean not only the online trading platform itself, but the broader subject of financial products and energy trading, whether online or otherwise. John said that the interest coming from the Hill is broader than the platform alone and reflects in many ways a lack of understanding of the benefits of what we do in this area. We will be coordinating this with the DC office. Please call me with any comments at 37007. _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ John Shelk@ENRON 06/25/2001 05:07 PM To: Tom Briggs/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, David Forster/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Taylor/Enron@EnronXGate Subject: Re: Trading Floor Visit For purposes of the congressional staff visit on July 13th -- and in general -- I think we are in agreement, as discussed at today's staff meeting, that when folks on the Hill say "Enron OnLine" they mean not only the online trading platform itself, but the broader subject of financial products and energy trading, whether online or otherwise. Just wanted to pass this on so those involved in the issue understand that interest coming from the Hill is broader than the platform alone and reflects in many ways a lack of understanding of the benefits of what we do in this area. Thanks. ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ From: Tom Briggs@ENRON on 06/25/2001 05:48 PM EDT To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, David Forster/Enron@EnronXGate, Mark Taylor/Enron@EnronXGate cc: John Shelk/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Trading Floor Visit Christy, As you recall, I have upset individuals by arranging to have Connie Lausten of the House Government Reform Committee meet with Dave and Mark on Friday, July 13th at 9am to discuss Enron Online. She would like to see the trading floor operations in addition to holding a discussion on Enron Online with Dave and Mark. Can you plase arrange this and get back to John Shelk.
|