![]() |
Enron Mail |
-----Original Message----- From: Novosel, Sarah Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:09 AM To: Nicolay, Christi L. Subject: FW: Enron Motion -----Original Message----- From: Nicolay, Christi L. Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:46 AM To: 'sbehrend@llgm.com' Cc: Novosel, Sarah; Robertson, Linda; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D. Subject: Enron Motion Sam -- Here are some thoughts we had for the Motion (plan to file 9/4/01). For those not committing to join a big RTO: No market based rates Lower rate of return No further stranded cost recovery FERC opines on allowing a "safe harbor" on tax issue for those divesting No innovative rates (could be a carrot too for those that join) For non-jurisdictionals -- loss of all reciprocity tariffs/ subject to pancaking Loss of native load exception May be some other items that Pat Wood used as incentives in Texas I have to respond in the SE RTO at 3:30 Houston time today and have a brief 4:00 conf call, but Sarah and I could either chat after that or on Monday (my cell 713-301-3421). Thanks and we are happy to have you helping us! Christi
|