Enron Mail

From:cburreson@hotmail.com
To:cynthia.sokolowsky@mcd.com, heidi.partain@mcd.com, danny.cervantes@mcd.com,landa.carlson@mcd.com, gsolberg@enron.com, ahaugh@nortom.com, kerichampagne@hotmail.com, carrieburreson@hotmail.com
Subject:Fwd: letter about Afghanistan worth reading
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Sat, 22 Sep 2001 17:38:19 -0700 (PDT)

I'm not forming an opinion, just thought it was worth reading...


<From: "Mari Hayes" <marihayes@hotmail.com<
<To: aparentukusa@mich.com
<CC: ALaird0196@aol.com
<Subject: letter about Afghanistan worth reading
<Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 11:39:52
<
<
<I'm forwarding this as it expresses a lot of my sentiment, and I truly feel
<any kind of major military attack will open pandora's box, or a wasp nest
<if you like and the results will be disasterous. To have thousands more
<innocent people die is also an act of terrorism, it IS TIME to see where
<all the hate comes from and clean up our own backyard. 600,000 children
<have died in Iraq because of the sanctions, Afghanistan exists in the stone
<age...yes the Palestinians have committed acts of terror against the
<Israeli's, but the Israeli's have also terrorized the Palestinians. YES
<those that backed the crimes should be brought to justice but NOT at the
<cost of a lot more innocent lives...time to use some of their own tricks
<instead of going in with the heavy artillery, which kills indiscriminately.
<
<Hello all, I thought you might want to read this obviously heartfelt
<letter that was forwarded to me from an American that grew up in
<Afghanistan. I think the perspective is an interesting one and perhaps one
<that few of us have access to.
<Anne Sofia
<
<Dear Friends, Yesterday I heard a lot of talk about "bombing Afghanistan
<back to the Stone Age." Ronn Owens, on KGO Talk Radio allowed that this
<would mean killing innocent people, people who had nothing to do with this
<atrocity, but "we're at war, we have to accept collateral damage," and he
<asked, "What else can we do? What is your suggestion?" Minutes later I
<heard a TV pundit discussing whether we "have the belly to do what must be
<done."
<
<I thought about these issues especially hard because I am from
<Afghanistan, and even though I've lived here for 35 years I've never
<lost track of what's been going on over there. So I want to share a few
<thoughts with anyone who will listen.
<
<I speak as one who hates the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden. There is no
<doubt in my mind that these people were responsible for the atrocity in
<New York. I fervently wish to see those monsters punished.
<
<But the Taliban and Ben Laden are not Afghanistan. They're not even the
<government of Afghanistan. The Taliban are a cult of ignorant psychotics
<who captured Afghanistan in 1997 and have been holding the country in
<bondage ever since. Bin Laden is a political criminal with a master
<plan. When you think Taliban, think Nazis. When you think Bin Laden,
<think Hitler. And when you think "the people of Afghanistan" think "the
<Jews in the concentration camps." It's not only that the Afghan people
<had nothing to do with this atrocity. They were the first victims of
<the perpetrators. They would love for someone to eliminate the Taliban and
<clear out the rats nest of international thugs holed up in their
<country. I guarantee it.
<
<Some say, if that's the case, why don't the Afghans rise up and
<overthrow the Taliban themselves? The answer is, they're starved,
<exhausted, damaged, and incapacitated. A few years ago, the United
<Nations estimated that there are 500,000 disabled orphans in
<Afghanistan--a country with no economy, no food. Millions of Afghans
<are widows of the approximately two million men killed during the war with
<the Soviets. And the Taliban has been executing these women for being women
<and have buried some of their opponents alive in mass graves. The soil of
<Afghanistan is littered with land mines and almost all the farms have been
<destroyed . The Afghan people have tried to overthrow the Taliban. They
<haven't been able to.
<
<We come now to the question of bombing Afghanistan back to the Stone
<Age. Trouble with that scheme is, it's already been done. The Soviets
<took care of it . Make the Afghans suffer? They're already suffering.
<Level their houses? Done. Turn their schools into piles of rubble?
<Done. Eradicate their hospitals? Done. Destroy their infrastructure? There
<is no infrastructure. Cut them off from medicine and health care? Too late.
<Someone already did all that.
<
<New bombs would only land in the rubble of earlier bombs. Would they at
<least get the Taliban? Not likely. In today's Afghanistan, only the
<Taliban eat, only they have the means to move around. They'd slip away
<and hide. (They have already, I hear.) Maybe the bombs would get some
<of those disabled orphans, they don't move too fast, they don't even have
<wheelchairs. But flying over Kabul and dropping bombs wouldn't really be a
<strike against the criminals who did this horrific thing. Actually it would
<be making common cause with the Taliban--by raping once again the people
<they've been raping all this time
<
<So what else can be done, then? Let me now speak with true fear and
<trembling. The only way to get Bin Laden is to go in there with ground
<troops. I think that when people speak of "having the belly to do what
<needs to be done" many of them are thinking in terms of having the
<belly to kill as many as needed. They are thinking about overcoming moral
<qualms about killing innocent people. But it's the belly to die not kill
<that's actually on the table. Americans will die in a land war to get Bin
<Laden. And not just because some Americans would die fighting their way
<through Afghanistan to Bin Laden's hideout. It's much bigger than that,
<folks. To get any troops to Afghanistan, we'd have to go through Pakistan.
<Would they let us? Not likely. The conquest of Pakistan would have to be
<first. Will other Muslim nations just stand by? You see where I'm going.
<The invasion approach is a flirtation with global war between Islam and the
<West.
<
<And that is Bin Laden's program. That's exactly what he wants and why
<he did this thing. Read his speeches and statements. It's all right there.
<AT the moment, of course, "Islam" as such does not exist. There are Muslims
<and there are Muslim countries, but no such political entity as Islam. Bin
<Laden believes that if he can get a war started, he can constitute this
<entity and he'd be running it. He really believes Islam would beat the
<west. It might seem ridiculous, but he figures if he can polarize the world
<into Islam and the West, he's got a billion soldiers. If the West wreaks a
<holocaust in Muslim lands, that's a billion people with nothing left to
<lose, even better from Bin Laden's point of view. He's probably wrong about
<winning, in the end the west would probably overcome--whatever that would
<mean in such a war; but the war would last for years and millions would
<die, not just theirs but ours. Who has the belly for that? Bin Laden yes,
<but anyone else?
<
<I don't have a solution. But I do believe that suffering and poverty
<are the soil in which terrorism grows. Bin Laden and his cohorts want to
<bait us into creating more such soil, so they and their kind can
<flourish. We can't let him do that. That's my humble opinion.
<
<Tamim Ansary
<< << < <
<< << <
<< << <
<< << < _________________________________________________________________
<< << < Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
<< <http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
<< << <
<< << <
<< <<
<< <
<< <
<< <
<<
<


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp