|
|
Enron Mail |
Carol and Chris,
I'm not sure Sharon knows what she is doing. If we accept her blacklined changes, it seems to me we go back to the original EEI language about penalties which we like. Perhaps we should just try this. The drafting technique she wants to use does not get her where she thinks it does. If and when her attorney reads this thing, the issue will be: do we remain silent about penalties, or do we go into more detail? We want to go into more detail if they cannot accept the standard language. Our choice seems to be: 1. Tell her we accept her change and sign the cover sheet and try to blow it by them, or 2. open the can of worms of more detail and get it over with. Let's discuss this. ----cgy -----Original Message----- From: St Clair, Carol Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 10:32 AM To: Yoder, Christian Subject: RE: Revised EEI Cover Sheet Carol St. Clair EB 3889 713-853-3989 (Phone) 713-646-3393 (Fax) carol.st.clair@enron.com ----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/16/2001 12:32 PM ----- "Firooz, Sharon" <SFirooz@SDGE.com< 05/16/2001 12:30 PM To: "'Chris.H.Foster@enron.com'" <Chris.H.Foster@enron.com< cc: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com, "Tierney, Michael C." <MTierney@sempra.com< Subject: RE: Revised EEI Cover Sheet Chris, we are leaning more toward the generic language and think that it could expedite the approval process. I have attached the language we propose which basically deletes the specific language regarding penalty for replacement and sale prices (see section 1.a (1) and (2)in the attached). I wanted to send this to you quickly before you spent a lot of time on the other one. THX -----Original Message----- From: Chris.H.Foster@enron.com [mailto:Chris.H.Foster@enron.com << File: SDGE (3-20-01)_.doc << ] Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 6:20 AM To: SFirooz@SDGE.com Cc: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com Subject: RE: Revised EEI Cover Sheet Sharon: As indicated by my previous e-mail to you, since Shari Stack has left Enron, it will take me a couple days to resurrect this EEI. Later today it is likely I will reconfirm that we are ready to sign the last draft we sent. Subsequently, I will get you a clear statement as to alternative language that leaves the Replacement Cost definition less clear ala WSPP. Thanks Chris -----Original Message----- From: "Firooz, Sharon" <SFirooz@SDGE.com<@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Firooz+2C+20Sharon+22+20+3CSFirooz+40SDGE+2Ecom+3E+40ENR ON@ENRON.com ] Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 11:05 AM To: Foster, Chris H. Subject: FW: Revised EEI Cover Sheet As we discussed. -----Original Message----- From: Shari.Stack@enron.com [mailto:Shari.Stack@enron.com << File: SDGE (3-20-01).doc << ] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 3:23 PM To: sfirooz@sdge.com; mtierney@sempra.com Cc: Chris.H.Foster@enron.com Subject: Revised EEI Cover Sheet The attached draft EEI Cover Sheet contains the latest amendments to the Replacement Price/Sales Price definitions. The changes are blacklined - everything else has remained the same. Thanks, Shari Stack Enron North America, Legal Department Tel: (713) 853-9477 (See attached file: SDGE (3-20-01).doc) - SDGE (3-20-01).doc - SDGE (3-20-01)_.doc
|