Enron Mail

From:carol.clair@enron.com
To:paul.simons@enron.com
Subject:FX/Currency Option Questions
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Mon, 19 Jun 2000 03:00:00 -0700 (PDT)

Paul:
Can you help me with this as we are trying to finalize the ISDA this week?
Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/19/2000 10:00 AM -----

Carol St Clair
06/13/2000 10:08 AM

To: Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FX/Currency Option Questions

Paul:
Shari recommended that I forward these questions to you. We are trying to
finalize an ISDA Master with dresdner bank in Germany and they wanted to make
some chnages to our FX and Currency Option language which I have attached.
Can you help me with this?



Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/13/2000 10:03 AM -----

Carol St Clair
05/09/2000 11:54 AM

To: Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FX/Currency Option Questions

Shari:
I am negotiating an ISDA with Dresdner Bank and I have the following
questions concerning their mark-up of the FX/Currency Option language:

1. In the EMU Protocol language they want to add a reference to Section 6.
I'm not sure why but wanted your thoughts on this. Are there any
circumstances under which we do not adopt the Protocol provisions?

2. They want to define the FX Definitions as the 1998 FX and Currency Option
Definitions as amended and supplemented by the 1998 ISDA Euro Definitions.
Is this okay? What is the effect of this? Should we change our form to do
this? With respect generally to the FX and Currency Option Definitions, as a
general rule are they always incorporated by reference into the terms of any
FX and Currency Option transaction even if it is electronically confirmed?
They wanted to add language to that section of our form specifically stating
this.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Carol