|
|
Enron Mail |
Greg:
Can you help me answer this question? Also, we have been through our ISDA forms and had the following questions with respect to Canadian law matters? 1. We have assumed that for all ISDA Masters where Canadian law applies, we should not insert our arbitration provision. Is this correct? 2. With respect to the Trade Option exemption and Eligible Swap Participant reps that we normally insert in our form (which I have enclosed below), we have assumed that the only time that these reps should not be inserted is when the Master is between ECC and a Canadian or Foreign counterparty? Is this correct? What we are unsure about is whther these reps are needed when ECC's counterparty is a US entity. We look forward to hearing from you. Carol ----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/19/2000 04:14 PM ----- Carol St Clair 05/15/2000 12:27 PM To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT cc: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: ISDA Securities Rep Weyerhaeuser Company Limited, Peter: Weyerhaeuser Company Limited, a company located in Ontario, wants to change the standard securities rep that we have in our current ISDA Schedule to the following: "It is a Qualified Party within the meaning of the Ontario Securities Commission, Rule 91-505 Over-the-Counter Derivatives." Our current rep is attached. Is this something that we can agree to? Carol
|