RE: MEGA Deals to Assigned

Rhonda and/or Christian:
Could someone revise the amendment that I sent around to amend these
confirms? Thanks.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

Rhonda L Denton
06/06/2001 04:58 PM

To: Wendy Conwell/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON
cc: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy
Ngo/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON, Christian Yoder/ENRON@enronXgate@ENRON
Subject: RE: MEGA Deals to Assigned

The following deal confirmations do not contain the product definitions for
SP-15 delivery (CAISO) and Palo Verde/Mid Columbia (West Firm)

226189 (SP15)
220051 (SP15)
220052 (SP15)
249547 (PV)
200536 (MidC)

Therefore, the amendment will need to contain the definition of CAISO Energy
and West Firm Energy.

From: Wendy Conwell/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/06/2001 03:31 PM
To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy
Ngo/ENRON@enronXgate, Christian Yoder/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: RE: MEGA Deals to Assigned

To Rhonda,

My bad...It looks like MEGA is assigning ALL of its physical power positions
with EPMI to ENA. The attached spreadsheet below has the options in the
lower section, which should really be part of the "to be assigned" group.

To All,

Sorry for the confusion,

Wendy

-----Original Message-----
From: Conwell, Wendy
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 2:53 PM
To: Denton, Rhonda
Cc: Murphy, Melissa Ann; St Clair, Carol; Ngo, Tracy; Yoder, Christian
Subject: MEGA Deals to Assigned

Please find attached a spreadsheet which matches up the MEGA Deals with the
EPMI deals to be assigned from MEGA to Morgan. Please review deal numbers
for accuracy and then review the confirms to ensure that all necessary West
Product Definitions are either in the confirm. If they are not in the
confirm, they need to be identified in the amendment to the Master Agreement
with Morgan.

Thanks,
Wendy

<< File: Deals COB 052801 (to assign to mscg).xls <<