|
|
Enron Mail |
Harry:
Clement is fine with this form Carol Harry M Collins 06/21/2000 10:16 AM To: Carol St.Clair cc: Subject: Re: Multi Purpose Form of Guaranty Enclosed is Alan's response to the draft. Do you know if Enron Corp is prepared to execute a similiar guarantee? I believe that the introductory sections on liquids could be expanded to include, SO2 and NOx and other emission credit trading, coal, bandwidth and pulp, paper and other wood products trading. ----- Forwarded by Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000 10:09 AM ----- Alan Aronowitz 06/21/2000 09:56 AM To: Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Multi Purpose Form of Guaranty I think this is a very good idea. I assume that Corp. will be willing to sign a reciprocal form of this Guaranty. Yes, I believe coal, emissions, bandwidth and pulp & paper (?) should be added to the form in the "Transactions" paragraph as bracketed language that could be used as appropriate. Harry, I assume you will handle developing the language and submitting to Carol. Do you know if Corp. has signed off on the form yet? Alan Harry M Collins 06/21/2000 09:38 AM To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Multi Purpose Form of Guaranty Please find attached for your review and approval a new multi-commodity guaranty, which has been developed by Carol St. Clair. This new form would be used for power, gas and liquids transactions. I believe that it could also be used for emissions and coal transactions Jeff has already signed off on this new format. ----- Forwarded by Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000 09:24 AM ----- Carol St Clair 06/02/2000 06:24 PM To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Mary Tudon/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Multi Purpose Form of Guaranty Jeff, Stacy and Harry: We have developed a form of multi-product counterparty Guaranty that is a little different from our old form of counterparty Guaranty. The main difference is the deletion of the 15 day cure period in Section 2. Can you please take a look at this and let me know if you are okay with this as something credit can send to counterparties? Thanks. carol
|