|
|
Enron Mail |
David:
Please keep in mind that we are not basing our decision on which counterparties to contact solely based on exposure and credit concern information, but rather based on all of the categories that Mark Taylor and I have asked you to compile with respect to each counterparty so I don't want the exposure numbers to be limited to any particular type of counterparty. Carol St. Clair EB 3892 713-853-3989 (Phone) 713-646-3393 (Fax) carol.st.clair@enron.com David P Dupre 07/06/2000 10:28 AM To: Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Project Hi, I don't know how this was settled between Carol and Russell, and I don't understand why Russell would not want to provide this exposure information to us. As we discussed earlier last month, I think it would be good to select a date, let's say July 5th in this case, and then go forward. I like your idea of identifying whether the c/p is a 'credit concern' or a 'good credit', perhaps this could be listed in the 'status' column on the following spreadsheet. I have attached a list of updated counterparty names. Thanks David ---------------------- Forwarded by David P Dupre/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000 10:09 AM --------------------------- To: David P Dupre/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Project How did things get settled between Carol and Russell? Looking over the spreadsheet itself, I would be able to tell you right off which counterparties we consider "Credit Concerns", where you would then prioritize on your end. Even though some counterparties may high high exposures, we consider them to be "Good Credits" (for example Duke). Once again, financial exposures vary (sometimes very significantly) from one day to the next. Therefore the totals you'll have for current exposures will not be validated for more than a week, at the max. Let me know how you want to go about this. I think if I highlight which counterparties we feel you should look into, this would go a lot faster. Regards--VE
|