|
|
Enron Mail |
FYI. Sue Mara is the GA lead and is working with the ESP and customer groups to respond to (and if at all possible, work with) the utilities.
Best, Jeff -----Original Message----- From: JBennett [mailto:JBennett@GMSSR.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 11:41 AM To: Jeff Dasovich (E-mail) Subject: Update on the Implementation of the Suspension of Direct Access Below is a summary of the events which have been occurring since last week's meeting between the UDCs and ESPs re the implementation of the suspension of direct access: 1. On October 3rd, a small working group comprised of representatives of the three UDCs, Enron, Commonwealth and UC/CSU had a conference call to discuss the filing of a joint proposal on the numerous issues surrounding the implementation of the suspension of direct access. While SCE was represented on the call, it was clear that they were not interested in a joint proposal and would file their own plan. On the call, drafting assignments were divvied up and another call was scheduled for Tuesday the 9th. 2. On October 4h (as directed by the decision suspending DA), the UDCs submitted letters to the Energy Division on their progress in implementing the suspension. PG&E and SDG&E submitted a joint letter which basically set forth what they had done to date and their progress of working with the ESPs. They stated that they anticipated filing a joint proposal with the ESPs soon. SCE, however, was more specific in its submission. Therein, SCE states that "SCE will not accept connect DASRs after October 20, 2001." The submittal also states that "SCE will not process connect DASRs for service accounts which did not exist on September 20, 2001." 3. On October 9th, a conference call was held between SDG&E, PG&E, Enron, Commonwealth, NewWest and UC/CSU. At that time, SDG&E and PG&E informed the ESPs that they would not be able to file a joint proposal. That, instead, they would be filing an advice letter (probably joint between the two UDCs) which proposed a connect DASR cut off date. While a definitive date was not stated, they indicated that it would be around the end of the year. 4. PG&E and SDG&E stated that they would file such advice letters by the end of the week. Parties would have approximately 10 days to respond.
|