Enron Mail |
OK, here are the facts as I understand them: The CPUC filed petitions for =
review of the FERC's various refund orders in the Ninth Circuit Court of Ap= peals. There is an unresolved jurisdictional issue that the petitions filed= in the Ninth Circuit are incurably premature because they sought review of= orders for which the petitioner was also requesting rehearing. The curren= t status of the CPUC's Ninth Circuit petitions is that the court has not ye= t dismissed the petitions as premature and FERC must file the record in the= Ninth tomorrow, October 26. At that point, under Section 313 of the Feder= al Power Act, the jurisdiction of the court of appeals becomes exclusive, a= nd FERC will not be able to modify the orders under review except by leave= of the court. FERC has filed, and the CPUC is supporting, a motion for an= order permitting FERC to keep jurisdiction over its orders so that it can = act on the pending rehearing requests. By all rights, the court should go = along with this, but it's gone on this long. We are not adversely impacted= . Arguably if FERC loses jurisdiction, the PNW and CA refund cases should = come to a complete stop, although this is an unlikely scenario. I will kee= p you posted of new developments. Ray
|