|
|
Enron Mail |
Charles I am OK with your simplifications. There was indeed repetition. There is still some redundancy at the very end (Are forward markets irrelevant?). But I think it does not hurt. I think the graph Mike included needs some further explanation. It is not self-explanatory. As per my conversation with Christi this morning, I will NOT contact Larry Ruff until I hear from you guys. I understand that you will be discussing this paper with Doug Gilbert today. Please let me know if I can be of any help. I am availablt today and tomorrow. Tks LM -----Original Message----- From: Yeung, Charles Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 11:15 AM To: Nicolay, Christi L.; Maurer, Luiz Cc: Walton, Steve; Novosel, Sarah; Steffes, James D.; Shapiro, Richard Subject: ERCOT Balanced Schedules I have added an executive summary, removed a repetitive argument on historical need for balanced schedules and retitled the section headings. << File: BALANCED SCHEDULES 26November.doc <<
|