Enron Mail

From:d..steffes@enron.com
To:susan.mara@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Subject:CALIFORNIA NEXT STEPS
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Thu, 9 Aug 2001 06:14:13 -0700 (PDT)


Can we talk at 9am your time - lots going on.

Jim


-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Robert C.
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 7:13 PM
To: Mara, Susan
Cc: Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry
Subject: RE: 1 cent surcharge

Sue, thanks. I think it would be a good idea to see what others with Direct Access customers and a negative CTC balance are considering doing.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mara, Susan
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 6:46 PM
To: Williams, Robert C.
Cc: Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry
Subject: RE: 1 cent surcharge

As I mentioned previously, ARM is supporting the SCE approach which does not charge DA customers for the 1 cent. ARM is working with the Energy Div staff to get a favorable ruling on it. We decided that approach had the highest probability of success. But ARM will seek to change the earlier order charging DA if this approach doesn't work.

I have not really talked to other ARM members on the PX Credit balances. I can if you like. I believe we should follow the requirements in our tariff and ESP/UDC agreement for a dispute as the best first step.

-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Robert C.
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 4:50 PM
To: Mara, Susan
Subject: 1 cent surcharge

Sue,

Any information about whether ARM plans to challenge the passthrough of this? Also, on a separate subject, are there any plans to challenge PG&E's and SCE's removing our PX Credit balances from customer's bills?