![]() |
Enron Mail |
A good summary of current RTO activities.
Jim -----Original Message----- From: "Dick S George" <dsg47@earthlink.net<@ENRON Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:29 AM To: DS George Subject: FERC RTO Week CC list suppressed... RTO Week at FERC Leads to Lifting of December Deadline Nov. 11 (California Energy Markets) Following up on a week-long series of workshops it called "RTO Week," the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued an order on November 7 to clarify its expectations for the development of regional transmission organizations throughout the country [RM01-12]. In addition to acknowledging the comments it received at the workshops during the week of October 15-19, it seemed clear from the order that the federal commissioners heard loud and clear the message being conveyed at FERC's Western regional infrastructure workshop held last week in Seattle--"don't fence us in." The FERC order tactfully backpedaled from the commission's recent assertions that it would like to see four regional RTOs in the country and made particular, though veiled, reference to Western parties' objections to a regionwide RTO: "In the West, it is now apparent that the presence of three sub-regional organizations (bound by a workable seams agreement) under a larger umbrella organization has the potential to succeed." With this statement, FERC left open the likelihood that the California Independent System Operator, WestConnect (the successor to Desert Star) and RTO West in the Northwest would continue to have operational jurisdiction for transmission services in their respective regions. FERC also clarified that it intends to proceed in developing RTOs on two parallel tracks. In the pending RTO dockets already filed at FERC, it will resolve the geographic scope and governance issues of the RTOs. In the docket in which this order was issued, the commission will take up the thorny issues of transmission tariff and market-design rulemaking. The commission also recognized that market activities need not all fall under the rubric of a stand-alone RTO. For instance, it stated, the Midwest ISO, Alliance and the Southwest Power Pool have proposed forming one market-monitoring unit. The order paid special attention to inviting the participation of state regulators in developing viable RTO structures. FERC will be creating state-federal RTO panels and will seek their advice on the makeup of regional markets. FERC said it will also be meeting with investors in order to better understand financing of transmission projects as well as independent transmission companies. The commission reiterated its support of both for-profit transcos and nonprofit ISOs and "any reasonable combination of the two." FERC gave itself and those responsible for developing workable transmission organizations some breathing room as well. Recognizing that RTO development was at various stages throughout the country, it backed off from the December 15 operational deadline established in Order No. 2000. Rather, the commission will establish timelines addressing the development of RTOs in each general region in future orders [Shauna O'Donnell].
|