|
|
Enron Mail |
Don't we want the ISO to provide to whom the refunds are entitled?
Jim -----Original Message----- From: =09"Jo Ann Scott" <joann.scott@ferc.fed.us<@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-= +22Jo+20Ann+20Scott+22+20+3Cjoann+2Escott+40ferc+2Efed+2Eus+3E+40ENRON@ENRO= N.com]=20 Sent:=09Wednesday, August 08, 2001 8:29 AM To:=09acomnes@enron.com; Steffes, James D.; Robertson, Linda; Alvarez, Ray;= rfrank@enron.com; Frank, Robert; smara@enron.com Subject:=09FW message from ISO NOTE: WE RECEIVED THIS PROPOSED SCHEDULE FROM THE ISO AND ARE FORWARDING = IT ALL THE PARTIES ON OUR LIST AND ON SCE'S LIST. PLEASE NOTE THAT THEY I= NCLUDE THE ADDRESS TO FAX YOUR NON-DISLOSURE STATEMENT TO SO WE CAN GET T= HE DATA.. Aug 9 ISO provides mitigated prices together with a write-up =20 of its methodology and two attachments: gas prices and = =20 heat rates=20 Aug 14 ISO provides Transaction data (sales by bid segment) =20 Aug 17 ISO provides refund amounts by seller=20 (The remaining items that are on Staff's proposal =20 under the date of Aug 15th)=20 Aug 24 Initial pre-filed testimony by all=20 Aug 31 Responsive testimony by all=20 Sept 5 (The items listed on Staff's proposal for Aug 22, absent= =20 the Protective Order which already has been dealt with)= =20 Sept 6-13 Hearing=20 Sept 21 Briefing by all, including proposed findings of fact =20 with citations to the record support =20 =20 In putting together the above schedule the ISO was as aggressive as= it could be in making the essential data available. Although it will not= be possible to provide everything on the 9th, what will be provided on th= at date (the mitigated prices and their derivation) will allow the parties= to get started on the most important, and possibly controversial, data se= t, and will include the items covered by the Order issued by Chief Judge W= agner. The above schedule does afford Judge Birchman 10 days to prepare h= is findings and still comply with the 45 day limitation if he is willing t= o commence that 45-day schedule on Aug 17th, the date on which the ISO wou= ld complete the above submission. If Judge Birchman does not believe that= he is free to do so in light of the Commission Order, we would urge that = he certify to the Commission our joint request for a modest extension. (W= e do believe that the ISO will be in compliance, certainly substantially s= o, with the data that it is to produced within the specified 15-day period= and we read the Commission Order as intending to provide the ALJ a full 4= 5 days from the completion of the data submission.) =20 There is another important process issue that we have got to put in= place IMMEDIATELY. May I please prevail on you to include in your transm= ittal to all of the parties that they should fax a signed copy of the Non-= Disclosure Certificate to Stacey Karpenin at the ISO (mailing the original= to her). Stacey's fax number is (916) 608-7296 (her phone number is (916= ) 608-7273). In the transmittal to Stacey the ISO should be advised of th= e Company name and its billing code (there will be charges associated with= preparing the disk as well as air courier charges), the person to whom th= e materials are to be sent together with that individual's address, phone = and fax numbers. Upon receipt of the faxed signature page the ISO will air= courier ONE set of the materials to the designated individual. The ISO ca= n only assure that it will be able to air courier the materials for delive= ry on the 9th if it is in receipt of the Non-Disclosure Statement and the = above information by 3 PM (PDT) on the 8th.
|