|
|
Enron Mail |
Ray --
Let's discuss on today's Refund call. =20 Jim -----Original Message----- From: =09"Howard J. Weg" <hweg@pgwlaw.com<@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Howa= rd+20J+2E+20Weg+22+20+3Chweg+40pgwlaw+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]=20 Sent:=09Monday, August 20, 2001 10:35 PM To:=09'Howard Shapiro'; jdwatkiss@aol.com; david.meyer@avistacorp.com; nola= n.steiner@avistacorp.com; rich.stevens@avistacorp.com; dvermillion@avistaen= ergy.com; asettanni@bracepatt.com; dwatkiss@bracepatt.com; kcurry@bracepatt= .com; rcarroll@bracepatt.com; GFergus@brobeck.com; andrzej_kabarowski@cargi= ll.com; phillip_fantle@cargill.com; psteele@coral-energy.com; rreilley@cora= l-energy.com; ray.alvarez@ei.enron.com; cyoder@enron.com; jhartso@enron.com= ; jsteffe@enron.com; Tribolet, Michael; Alvarez, Ray; Sanders, Richard B.; = rsanders@enron.com; smara@enron.com; Ebiery@fulbright.com; fyanney@fulbrigh= t.com; tfreiberg@fulbright.com; jfrizzell@gibbs-bruns.com; sbishop@gibbs-br= uns.com; CEKLUND@LLGM.COM; DWHITLEY@LLGM.COM; EHUFF@LLGM.COM; JKLAUBER@LLGM= .COM; JRNELSON@LLGM.COM; GErspamer@mofo.com; KIrvin@mofo.com; KZeitlin@mofo= .com; PMar@mofo.com; RLoeffler@mofo.com; jmcgrane@morganlewis.com; mgriffen= @morganlewis.com; hydeefeldstein@paulhastings.com; jenniferbaldochi@paulhas= tings.com; Timothy.Bolden@pinnaclewest.com; dmperlman@powersrc.com; rosteen= @powersrc.com; hao@quinnemanuel.com; wdsmith@sempra.com; rbeitler@sempratra= ding.com; PARAMFJORD@stoel.com; rcjosephson@stoel.com; SJKAPLAN@stoel.com; = awells@strook.com; ayudkowsky@strook.com; 'Cheryl Feik Ryan'; 'Gary Bachman= '; 'Julie Richardson' Subject:=09RE: Proposal re CalPX Methodologies It seems to me that FERC's July 25 Order required Judge Birchman to make findings about the exact amounts owed by each buyer to each seller. The proposal to establish methodologies does exactly that, among other things. Therefore, it seems to me that it needs to be part of the the pending California proceedings. That is not to say, however, that it should not also be part of the Chargeback proceedings under the April 6 FERC order. It should also be applicable to those proceedings. Therefore, we need to develop a strategy to make it part of both proceedings. Timing is obviously critical, and I am soliciting the Chargeback movants' views on that subject along with the substance of the proposal. I would like to point out that I have learned from the settlemen= t proceedings before Judge Wagner that we must submit the proposal early in the proceedings to ensure that they are considered and can have an impact. I sent an email to Ron Carroll letting him know that I am available for a conference call at the following times: Weds Aug 22 after 11 am Pacific time, Thurs Aug 23 prior to 1 pm Pacific time, Fri Aug 24 anytime except 1130 am to 2 pm Pacific time Please let me know when we can discuss this further. Thanks for your help.
|