RE: Enron DASRs filed since July 1, 2001

Tom --

There does appear to be some intelligence gathering going on at the CPUC. You should speak with legal about the inquiry. Clearly the CPUC has a right to ask anything they want - it is my understanding is that our customers have a confidentiality clause in their contract that prohibits them from responding.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: "Riley, Tom" <Tom.Riley@enron.com<@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Riley+2C+20Tom+22+20+3CTom+2ERiley+40enron+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 5:55 PM
To: Steffes, James D.; Mara, Susan; Dasovich, Jeff
Cc: Evans,Mark; Wu,Andrew; Hurt,Robert; Frazier,Lamar; Huddleson,Diann
Subject: FW: Enron DASRs filed since July 1, 2001

Jim, et al,

Interesting e-mail from UC. Apparently the PUC is implying to UC that DASRs
submitted after July 1 need to be associated with a contract executed prior
to July 1. Is this consistent with our intell? Can they make these
inquiries? Please advise.

Tom

< -----Original Message-----
< From: Maric Munn <Maric.munn@ucop.edu<@ENRON@EES
< Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:38 PM
< To: TRiley@enron.com; dhuddles@enron.com
< Cc: mgutheinz@calstate.edu; KTilton <ktilton@gralegal.com<
< Subject: Fwd: Enron DASRs filed since July 1, 2001
<
< Tom, Diann -
<
< Do you have data on number of DASRs that have been submitted for UC/CSU
< accounts post July 1, 2001. DO you also have a breakdown of number of
< DASRs that were for accounts that were part of the original group of
< accounts that were un-DASRd and re-DASRd vs. the number of DASRs for the
< accounts that were being DASR'd for the first time? Read below -
< enquiring
< minds at the CPUC want to know.
<
< Thanks
<
< Maric
<
<
< <X-Sent: 30 Aug 2001 00:13:56 GMT
< <Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:03:09 -0700
< <From: KTilton <ktilton@gralegal.com<
< <X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I)
< <X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
< <To: Maric Munn <Maric.Munn@ucop.edu<, Mark Gutheinz
< <mgutheinz@calstate.edu<
< <CC: Irene Moosen <imoosen@gralegal.com<
< <Subject: Enron DASRs filed since July 1, 2001
< <
< <Maric, Mark:
< <
< <Our office has received telephone calls from CPUC Energy Division staff
< <regarding the Enron DASRs filed since July 1, 2001, and specifically
< <whether recent DASRs filed are under an existing contract - that was
< <executed prior to July 1 (as opposed to new Direct access contracts,
< <post July 1). The Energy Division staff is being asked by their
< <superiors to determine how many of the post-July 1 DASRs (for all
< <customers, not just UC/CSU) were under an existing contract versus a
< <new, post-July 1 contract. As you know, this relates to the revised
< <draft decision which suspends direct access effective July 1.
< <
< <We have explained that the new Enron DASRs for the campuses are under an
< <existing contract - the original contract that was executed in 1998. But
< <one energy staff member has requested a specific number of post-July 1
< <Enron DASRs filed for the campuses - as they were returned to direct
< <access service under the contract. Therefore, I am making this request
< <from you.
< <
< <Can you provide me with the following information:
< < 1. How many DASRs have been filed since July 1, 2001
< < 2. Of those, how many were inappropriately removed from direct
< <access back in February and how many were eligible, but never placed on
< <direct access service due to Enron mistake?
< <I will use discretion in sharing the precise breakdown information on
< <the post-July 1 DASRs, but it is important that we have a clear
< <understanding of the precise numbers.
< <
< <Please let me know if you have any questions on this matter. I realize
< <that you are both busy, and I appreciate your attention to this matter.
< <
< <thanks
< <
< <Kelly
<
<