|
|
Enron Mail |
Pat --
If you're in on Friday, let's sit down for 15. Thanks, Jim -----Original Message----- From: Keene, Patrick Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:19 PM To: '"Bonnie Drinkwater" <bdrinkwater@Mcdonaldcarano.com<@ENRON'; Kaufman, Paul Cc: Steffes, James D. Subject: RE: Intervention into Nevada Power rate cases We should intervene based on our potential interest in serving customers pursuant to AB661(short answer=Paul's language). It is possible that we may want to reduce revenue requirements by recommending the use of financial products to minimize utility revenue risk. We have intervened in the AB 661 regulation proceeding as Enron Energy Services, Inc. and Enron Power Marketing, Inc. If you think we can raise issues outside of "unbundling" we should limit our intervention to EES and EPMI. -----Original Message----- From: "Bonnie Drinkwater" <bdrinkwater@Mcdonaldcarano.com<@ENRON Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:58 AM To: Keene, Patrick; Kaufman, Paul Cc: Steffes, James D. Subject: RE: Intervention into Nevada Power rate cases Pat, Shall I use the language proposed by Paul or would you like me to say something different? Please let me know ASAP as I would like to get the petition filed today. Thanks. Bonnie -----Original Message----- From: Keene, Patrick [mailto:Patrick.Keene@ENRON.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:55 AM To: Kaufman, Paul; Bonnie Drinkwater Cc: Steffes, James D. Subject: RE: Intervention into Nevada Power rate cases We have intervened in certain cases where we may have an ongoing commercial interest to require "rate unbundling" in anticipation of direct access. We also can intervene on behalf of EWS who may provide risk mgt. products to reduce utility rates (i.e., weather derivitives to stabilize rates and reduce utility-reated risk). In this case we are there to make sure rates are properly unbundled to facilitate AB 661. -----Original Message----- From: Kaufman, Paul Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 7:57 PM To: 'Bonnie Drinkwater' Cc: Keene, Patrick; Steffes, James D. Subject: RE: Intervention into Nevada Power rate cases By this e-mail, I'm forwarding this to Pat Keene. He will be your main contact on Nevada matters for a while. I'm swamped processing the filings for the sale of PGE. My view is that it should be both ENA and EES. Our interest is: (1) we are a potential new electric resource under AB 661; and (2) these cases will influence whether we can serve customers under the statute as the unbundled costs incurred by our potential customers will be determined in this case. Pat: What do we say in other states where we intervene and there is no direct access? I'd rather not say that we that we are representing the interests of several large consumers in Nevada. It opens our deals up for discovery. -----Original Message----- From: Bonnie Drinkwater [mailto:bdrinkwater@Mcdonaldcarano.com] Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 5:23 PM To: Kaufman, Paul Subject: Intervention into Nevada Power rate cases Paul, As I was preparing the petition to intervene, it occurred to me that information has changed. Do you want the petition to reflect both ENRON ENERGY SERVICES, INC. and ENRON NORTH AMERICA. Also, since you do not own LV Cogen anymore, what would you like me to put as the reasons for intervention for these entities. I have attached a draft petition. It needs to be filed on Wednesday. Thanks for your assistance. Bonnie ********************************************************************** This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. **********************************************************************
|