Enron Mail |
I agree with Bob that the reporting issues are important. I also think that focusing on the "lessons learned" from the NE RTO and SE RTO mediation would be interesting. Have people from different industry groups discussing their views of where the mediations concluded (assuming we are finished by October). Any outstanding issues between EPSA members and between EPSA and other parts of the industry could be discussed.
Thanks, Jim -----Original Message----- From: "Reilley, Robert R." <breilley@coral-energy.com<@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Reilley+2C+20Robert+20R+2E+22+20+3Cbreilley+40coral-energy+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:26 AM To: 'Julie Simon'; jsteffe@enron.com Cc: Erin Perrigo; Jack Cashin; Jackie Gallagher; Mark Bennett; Michael Reddy Subject: RE: October Membership Meeting I'll certainly give it more thought, but I think that a discussion of reporting requirements would be timely. The NOPR on power transaction and contracts is out there, but has not got much attention yet due to the press of California issues and the RTO negotiations. Also, on October 1, entities selling gas in California have to make their first monthly report to FERC on purchases, sales, and transportation contracts. Additionally, the DOE has changed some of its annual reporting requirements. In all cases, confidentiality is an issue, and I believe that it is handled differently for each of these reports. A discussion of all these requirements from a practical "how to" or "do's and don'ts" perspective might not be sexy, but it would be useful to us preoccupied regulatory slugs... -----Original Message----- From: Julie Simon [mailto:JSIMON@epsa.org] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:14 AM To: Reilley, Robert R.; jsteffe@enron.com Cc: Erin Perrigo; Jack Cashin; Jackie Gallagher; Mark Bennett; Michael Reddy Subject: October Membership Meeting Do either of you have any suggestions for topics to focus on at the Regulatory Affairs Committee Meeting in October? At the last meeting we talked about market-based rate issues; the one before that, gas issues. We had thought of a "dialogue" with some senior FERC staff and a few of our members about big picture issues, but haven't been able to organize it. We could try that again. Or, what about interconnection issues or information collection/disclosure, since those seem to be rocketing up FERC's priority list. Any suggestions?
|