Re: #500966

Sorry for the delay - it's taken me a while to track down the answer to this,
because Chris Foster, the trader on this deal, is still unclear as to the
answer. Basically, the deal keeps getting cut by the Cal-ISO, which is why
Carla goes in and changes the volumes sometimes. But Chris thinks that in the
end we might not be cutting the deal financially, just physically on a
day-by-day basis. Given that, we only need the first, original confirm sent
out - if revised confirms have been sent, let's go ahead and send them the
original one and leave it at that.

Chris Foster said he would get back with me this afternoon - he's meeting
with Real Time and Schedulers right now to sort out this issue. I apologize
that this wasn't more clear before. Should I add a note in the comments
section of this deal to clarify? Or should I just check the deal back to "no
confirm"? Let me know.

Thanks,
Kate

From: Sharen Cason 01/24/2001 08:14 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: #500966

This is the deal that was originally in as not to be confirmed and was
changed to be confirmed. Well, I have confirmed twice because it keeps going
into pending status. The auditor indictes that carla is going into the deal
and changing something that causes it to go into pending. Can you check into
this and find out what she is changing, if we need to keep sending revised
confirmations, wha'sssss uuup with this deal?

Thanks!