|
|
Enron Mail |
I'm sorry, but I can't give you full credit on your answer to the second part
of my question. The correct answer was the author's use of the word "stunning" to describe the $6.2 billion figure. The word is clearly an editorialization on the amount of the refund requested, and is therefore journalistically incorrect. In addition, you failed to extemporize on why a journalist for an energy trade magazine would leave such gaping holes in his/her story. But because I'm feeling lenient this morning, I'll give you the details. There was no date. Kate
|