RE: Test of Forward Obligation

Dave Poston got me fixed up, I ran a report and am double checking it now.

From: Kroum Kroumov/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/22/2001 01:16 PM CST
To: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Test of Forward Obligation

Every program has two parts - Windows executable which we write in Delphi
and database in Oracle. We need to run the stage version of the program
against production data (database). The stage version of the program in
TestN
and TestP is the same, the database (the data) is different.

I think I will give you a call.

Thanks,
Kroum
713 -853 - 9980

-----Original Message-----
From: Semperger, Cara
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 11:23 AM
To: Kroumov, Kroum
Subject: RE: Test of Forward Obligation

So, I don't use the version of the report that runs against production? I
use stage? Which one, Test P or Test N?

From: Kroum Kroumov/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/22/2001 11:17 AM CST
To: Cara Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ENRON, Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Diana
Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: RE: Test of Forward Obligation

Cara,

Thanks a lot for the detail error report.
Actually to me is enough to see the selection screen and the numbers of
the deals
which are missing or are extra on the report.

1) I can see that you are running the older version of the report, because
there is selection
for Approval on the screen. Probably is our mistake. The shortcut does not
update the new
version. You need to run the STAGE Enpower launchpad with all the buttons at
first which
will copy the new version of Forward Obligation from the server to your local
computer
at first and then to run the shortcut.

2) I run the newer version here, I can see the parts of the deals 503112
and 503107
which you have highlited and the region totals were zero's. You can verify it.

3) We just released a new version to stage, which should have the same
reasults, but we
did some optimizations, we intend to reduce the speed soon.
The version number is 3.0.0.36, you can see it when you run the report or
click Help-About.
Until you don't see that number there is no use to continue testing, on any
problem
call David Poston

Thanks,
Kroum

-----Original Message-----
From: Semperger, Cara
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 10:27 AM
To: Kroumov, Kroum
Cc: Duong Luu/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Symes, Kate; Scholtes, Diana
Subject: Test of Forward Obligation

Good Morning,

I ran the new report against production, using the shortcut provided for me.
My results are innacurate because some transmission deals are not showing.
The strange thing is that there is no real pattern as to why some
transmission deals show and some don't.

I compared the forward ob to scheduling. You might want to do that
comparison for yourself there. Also, checking the Real-Time position manager
as well will help.

Please see this power point document.

<< File: fwdob_vs_sched_322.ppt <<