Enron Mail

From:kate.symes@enron.com
To:kimberly.allen@enron.com
Subject:Re: BPA
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Thu, 18 Jan 2001 05:58:00 -0800 (PST)

Re: the BPA deals - Sean Crandall said for pricing purposes it doesn't matter
whether the delivery point is in as Mid-C or NW delivered. The only reason he
entered NW delivered is because there was transmission involved. For your
purposes, Sean said it's fine to change the delivery point to Mid-C (NW
Delivered) in the confirms, but he didn't want to have it changed in EnPower
because that would mess with the routing.

Does that make any sense? Let me know if you need it changed in EnPower, and
I'll talk to Sean.

Thanks,
Kate





From: Kimberly Allen 01/18/2001 01:34 PM


To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: BPA

Also for #488526.01 and 488525.01 have the same issue with Delivery Point.

KA
---------------------- Forwarded by Kimberly Allen/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2001
03:36 PM ---------------------------

Enron North America Corp.

From: Kimberly Allen 01/18/2001 03:33 PM


To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: BPA

Kate, I have a couple of confirms I received from BPA with the following
info. I spoke with BPA and they said that their trader had talked to Sean
Crandall and agreed to Mid Columbia as the Delivery point, however in the
Enpower they have Northwest Delivered. Could you please check into:

#492613.01, 492612.01, 492611.01, 488524.01, 488523.01 These all say NW in
the system but BPA has Mid C on confirm

#491609.01 This trade has a trade date of 1/8/01. But on BPA's confirm they
have a trade date of 1/5/01. Could you ask Mike who did the trade which is
correct?

Thanks,

Kimberly