![]() |
Enron Mail |
I think we ran into this problem before where the California schedulers, for
whatever reason, didn't pull the .8 Riverside deal into their sheet, and therefore I didn't see it or add it to the EES sheet. Let me just check with Phil on this to make sure he didn't do it for a reason; then I can amend the sheet and re-send it. And on the Wed./Thurs. generation volumes - I can only assume that Phil spoke with Riverside at some point about the change to .55, but again I need to speak with him to verify this. He should be in the office soon, and I'll let you know as soon as I find out. Thanks, Kate Daniel Kang@EES 04/18/2001 06:47 AM To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Daily EES Positions through 4/19 Hey Kate, For 4/15 and 4/16, our schedules that we sent you show a Riverside Generatioin component of 0.8 every hour (SP15). This is not reflected in your current April update. The EnPower columns for these days should be increased by 0.8 for every hour. Right? Also, The generation component that I sent you for Wednesday and Thursday (which I sent Monday morning) had a generation component of 0.8. In reality, it was actually 0.55. I didn't have the generation schedule from Riverside and had to assume a value so I assumed it would be 0.8 because that's where it had been for a while. In your current file, you have the correct value of 0.55. How did you know this? Did Riverside call you to tell you they were at 0.55 instead of 0.8? Let me know. Thanks. Dan
|