Enron Mail

From:stephanie.piwetz@enron.com
To:kate.symes@enron.com
Subject:Re: Deal 565759.01
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Tue, 10 Apr 2001 02:02:00 -0700 (PDT)

Kate, we have created the confirm that represented the original deal. Total
400 mws, we have sent the confirm to Idaho, broker confirm matches original
deal, Melissa said we usually do not reconfirm deals that were cut. We have
put a comment in deal entry commenting that the deal was cut. Just as long
as you have all recorded on your side, with the mws. Hope this helps.
Thanks Sp



Kate Symes 04/09/2001 06:00 PM

To: Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Deal 565759.01

I'm sorry my response has been such a long time coming on this issue, but
I've visited with almost every department in our office trying to figure out
what happened to this deal. Basically, Idaho got their scheduled cut by the
Cal-ISO, which in turn means we have to cut our schedule flowing to Idaho. So
Jeremy Morris, one of our California schedulers, cut the first Idaho deal he
found and passed the remainder of the schedule to Real Time to fill, which
they did in a separate deal. So EPMI and Idaho are in agreement that the
schedule got cut, but that we kept them whole by selling the remainder to
Idaho in the hour-ahead market.

Now the question is, how do we confirm the deal? From your side, is it better
if we leave the deal as-is, or restore it to the original 25 mw off peak and
kill the real time deal (which wouldn't really be an accurate representation
of what happened)? Just let me know, and we'll do what we can to help.

Thanks,
Kate


Stephanie Piwetz 04/02/2001 12:00 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal 565759.01

Kate, please check, deal 565759.01, I verballed the trade with APB on Friday
3/30/01
Enron Sells Idaho
4/2-4/2
220.00 total mw s400
sp 15

Looks like it has been changed, each hour a different mw.
Please let me know the details.
Thanks
Stephanie