|
|
Enron Mail |
It's changed.
Kerri Thompson@ENRON 02/16/2001 01:26 PM To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: apb can you ch 523878 to the 17th? Kate Symes @ ECT 02/16/2001 10:46 AM To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: apb This deal is the same as all the others Carla Hoffman entered yesterday - in the interest of time, she entered all deals with a Saturday-Sunday mask in Deal Blotter. If the deals were on peak, she said it shouldn't matter that they were marked to flow both days, because Sunday is all off-peak hours. I explained this in a couple e-mails yesterday - I guess I got confused about who I told. Carla said she's done this before and it shouldn't be a problem. Please let me know if you agree with this. In my opinion, just taking the time to explain the discrepancy in the 10 or 12 deals that were entered this way actually took more time than it saved. What do you think? Kate Kerri Thompson@ENRON 02/16/2001 06:36 AM To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: apb what about this deal? Kerri Thompson 02/15/2001 04:13 PM To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: apb 523878 broker shows it for the 17th.
|