Enron Mail

From:winston.goodbody@enron.com
To:phillip.platter@enron.com, chris.mallory@enron.com, jeff.richter@enron.com,carla.hoffman@enron.com, kate.symes@enron.com
Subject:New Enpower Query
Cc:david.poston@enron.com, richard.schweiger@enron.com
Bcc:david.poston@enron.com, richard.schweiger@enron.com
Date:Fri, 8 Dec 2000 07:23:00 -0800 (PST)

Effective in the California scheduling sheet for 12/10 on, we are using a new
method to access Enpower data. There will be very little difference to users
of the sheet, but behind the scenes we have substituted calling an Oracle
stored procedure via ADO for what we had before, which was executing a SQL
string via DAO. When you go to pull in the daily data you may notice a
slight difference in the form: the choice we had before of selecting between
ADO and DAO is gone.

There is one difference in the sheet you need to know about. This concerns
what happens when a deal with a counter party that does not exist in our
local counter party tables comes in via the Oracle query. In the past, this
counter party and the deal's hourly amounts would appear in the spreadsheet,
but when we went to write CAPS templates, that counter party would not
appear. Someone would then tell me needed to add the counter party to our
local counter party tables.

Now what will happen is that the name UNKNOWN will appear in the sheet with
the hourly amounts for the missing counter party. As before, whatever this
missing counter party is will not appear in the CAPS templates. You will
still need to tell us what counter party is missing. You will figure out
which one it is in the same way you have in the past. We are working on a
process that will look up these missing counter parties and takes care of
everything automatically.