Enron Mail

From:kate.symes@enron.com
To:sharen.cason@enron.com
Subject:Re: 586775
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Fri, 20 Apr 2001 01:15:00 -0700 (PDT)

I just spoke with Heather Dunton in Risk, and she said they've had problems
valuing index forward deals that settle at the last 5-day NYMEX average. So
to remedy the situation, they're taking a fifth of the volume out of the deal
each day, beginning five days prior to the expiry date. In this case, the
expiry date is 4/25/01, so they began with taking 5 MW out of deal 585480 and
putting it into a fixed price forward deal - 586775. Each day Heather will
take another fifth of the volume in 585480 and put it into 586775, and she'll
average the fixed prices each day to eventually end up with the last 5-day
average. That's the long and short of why this new forward deal - 586775 -
doesn't need to be confirmed. Our position with Deseret stays the same - it's
just split between two deals temporarily.

Please call Heather or me with any questions. She's going to add another
comment in both deals to indicate the changes she'll be making, so it should
be apparent to everyone that 586775 does not need to be confirmed at any
point. When we get to the expiry date, Heather will kill that fixed forward
deal, since the index price will pull into the system and 585480 will value
properly.

Sorry for the winded explanation, but I thought it was better to give you
more than less!

Thanks,
Kate





From: Sharen Cason 04/20/2001 06:31 AM


To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 586775

Can you check and see why we are not confirming this deal with Deseret? It
is on the not to be confirmed list.

Thanks!