Enron Mail

From:rkbooth@attglobal.net
To:ksymes@enron.com
Subject:Re: Resource Contingency Program - Oregon. Final Environmental
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Thu, 2 Nov 2000 08:08:00 -0800 (PST)

Cc: ed.clark@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bcc: ed.clark@enron.com
X-From: rkbooth@attglobal.net
X-To: ksymes@enron.com
X-cc: ed.clark@enron.com
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \kate symes 6-27-02\Notes Folders\Rainy day
X-Origin: SYMES-K
X-FileName: kate symes 6-27-02.nsf

Thanks Kate, this looks like a good template. At this point, I need to spen=
d=20
a few minutes with Ed to discuss the scope associated with a project=20
description.? There are a number of figures and engineering tasks that are=
=20
typically required (e.g., flow diagrams, water/steam balances, site=20
layout/location drawings, noise review, electric inter tie, emissions data,=
=20
etc.).=20
Ed: Could you give me a call on this when you have a minute?=20

Thanks,=20
--Bob=20

ksymes@enron.com wrote:=20

It looks like the entire EIS for the Hermiston Power Project is here.
However, I have yet to locate anything on the Chehalis Project
specifically. I have ordered hard copies of both documents from BPA and
they should be here by Monday, at which point I can make copies and send
them out.

Please look this over and let me know if it will still be necessary to
send hard copies. I will be happy to accomodate either way.

Katehttp://nepa.eh.doe.gov/eis/eis0230/eis0230_toc.html




First PageList Of FiguresList Of Tables

Resource Contingency Program - Oregon. Final Environmental Statement=20
Hermiston Power Project EIS-0230

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GLOSSARY=20

Resource Contingency Program=01*Oregon=20

1.0 INTRODUCTION=20

1.1 Purpose and Need=20
1.2 Alternatives=20

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION =01*HERMISTON=20
2.1 Site Location=20
2.2 Project Components=20
2.3 Operating Schedule=20
2.4 Construction Schedule=20
2.5 Decommissioning
3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT =01*HERMISTON=20
3.1 Geology, Soils, and Floodplains=20
3.2 Water Resources=20
3.3 Air Quality=20
3.4 Noise=20
3.5 Vegetation and Wetlands=20
3.6 Wildlife and Fisheries Resources=20
3.7 Land Use=20
3.8 Cultural Resources=20
3.9 Socioeconomics and Public Services=20
3.10 Recreation Resources=20
3.11 Public Health and Safety=20
3.12 Visual Quality
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS =01*HERMISTON=20
4.1 Geology, Soils and Floodplains=20
4.2 Water Resources=20
4.3 Air Quality=20
4.4 Noise=20
4.5 Vegetation/Wetlands=20
4.6 Wildlife and Fisheries Resources=20
4.7 Land Use=20
4.8 Cultural Resources=20
4.9 Socioeconomics and Public Services=20
4.10 Recreation Resources=20
4.11 Public Health and Safety=20
4.12 Visual Quality=20

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION, REVIEW, AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS =01*HERMIST=
ON=20
5.1 National Environmental Policy Act=20
5.2 Threatened and Endangered Species and Critical Habitat=20
5.3 Fish and Wildlife Conservation=20
5.4 Cultural Resource (Heritage Conservation)=20
5.5 State, Areawide, and Local Plan and ProgramConsistency=20
5.6 Coastal Zone Management Program Consistency=20
5.7 Floodplains=20
5.8 Wetlands=20
5.9 Farmlands=20
5.10 Recreation Resources=20
5.11 Global Warming=20
5.12 Permit for Structures in Navigable Waters=20
5.13 Permit for Discharges into Waters of the United States=20
5.14 Permits for Right-of-Way on Public Lands=20
5.15 Energy Conservation at Federal Facilities=20
5.16 Pollution Control=20

6.0 LITERATURE CITED =01*HERMISTON=20

7.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT EIS AND RESPONSES =01*HERMISTON=20
7.1 Draft EIS Public Review Process=20
7.2 Draft EIS Comment Review Process=20
7.3 Comments and Responses
8.0 LIST OF PREPARERS=20
8.1 BPA EIS Team=20
8.2 Foster Wheeler Environmental EIS Team
APPENDIX A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE =01*HERMISTON POWER PROJECT
This file is not available electronically=20

APPENDIX B HEALTH AND SAFETY =01*HERMISTON
This file is not available electronically=20

First PageList Of FiguresList Of Tables