Enron Mail

From:kate.symes@enron.com
To:melissa.murphy@enron.com
Subject:Re: Request for New CTPY Name - Sierra Pacific Holding Co.
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Thu, 12 Apr 2001 01:17:00 -0700 (PDT)

Yes, the correct name does include "Inc." at the end. And yes, Steve Hall
said the master agreement works for this trade. He and Bob Ellery at Sierra
talked over the agreement and decided to use the name that Sierra Pacific
Holding Co. is doing business under. I've changed the deal (573679) in
EnPower. Please let me know if you turn up any more questions.

Thanks,
Kate




Melissa Ann Murphy
04/12/2001 06:52 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Request for New CTPY Name - Sierra Pacific Holding Co.

Hello, Sierra Pacific Industries, Inc. is a choice in Enpower. Is this the
correct name with the "Inc." on it? I am assuming that Steve Hall said it is
OK to use the master agreement for this trade.

Thanks,
Melissa


Kate Symes 04/11/2001 07:38 PM

To: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve C Hall/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Request for New CTPY Name - Sierra Pacific Holding Co.

Regarding the deal Chris Foster did on 4/6 with Sierra Pacific Holding Co. -

Bob Ellery, Sierra's Director of Energy Resources, and Steve Hall, one of
Portland's most expeditious lawyers, have decided to execute the deal under
the designation Sierra Pacific Industries, which is also named in the master
agreement. We still, however, need this name added to the counterparty list
in EnPower.

Thank you all for your help on this, and I appreciate your future assistance
in getting this deal out of the "New Counterparty" void.

Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486