Re: deal 541638

Testing was done in the test database; however, once they released the new
version of deal entry into production, they tested one more time to make sure
that the new fields were pulling into our scheduling reports. It was a
precautionary measure taken so that we wouldn't enter deals all day long only
to find out that they wouldn't show up in the Enpower to CAPS report at the
end of the day. Sorry for the confusion.

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/09/2001 10:34 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: deal 541638

Hi Kate,

Can you please let Phil know that he should be testing deals in the enpower
test database not the actual system.

Thanks

Kate Symes @ ECT 03/09/2001 12:20 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: deal 541638

This was just a practice deal entered by Phil yesterday to test our new
version of deal entry. He zeroed out the volume, but neglected to kill the
deal or at least change it to no confirm. So this is NOT a good deal - I'm
killing it now.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/09/2001 09:46 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: deal 541638

Kate can you ask Phil Platter is Dane Energy Corp the correct broker on this
deal?

Thanks