![]() |
Enron Mail |
The first market disruption fallback (after a 3 day waiting period) is an
"Alternative Price Source" which would need to be spelled out in the long description - but that only works if we have an alternative price source to specify. It's also important to make sure that the feared event is included in the Market Disruption Event definition. I think this is the relevant language from the GTC: 7. Market Disruption. If a Market Disruption Event has occurred and is continuing on any Trading Day, the Floating Price for such Trading Day shall be determined pursuant to the Floating Price Source specified in this Transaction for the first Trading Day thereafter on which no Market Disruption Event exists; provided, however, if the Floating Price is not so determined within three Business Days after the first Trading Day on which the Market Disruption Event occurred or existed, then the Floating Price shall be determined by reference to the Alternative Floating Price Source specified in this Transaction, if any, which is not subject to a Market Disruption Event. If no Alternative Floating Price Source is available or has been specified, and the Market Disruption Event continues for more than three Business Days, then the parties shall negotiate in good faith to agree on a Floating Price (or a method for determining a Floating Price), and if the parties have not so agreed on or before the twelfth Business Day following the first Trading Day on which the Market Disruption Event occurred or existed, then the Floating Price shall be determined in good faith by Enron, by taking the average of two or more dealer quotes. "Market Disruption Event" means, with respect to a Floating Price Source, any of the following events (the existence of which shall be determined in good faith by Enron): (a) the failure of the Floating Price Source to announce or publish information necessary for determining the Floating Price; (b) the failure of trading to commence or the permanent discontinuation or material suspension of trading in the relevant futures contract, options contract or commodity on the exchange or market (e.g., NYMEX) acting as the Floating Price Source (the "Exchange"); © the temporary or permanent discontinuance or unavailability of any relevant Floating Price Source; (d) the temporary or permanent closing of any Exchange acting as the Floating Price Source; (e) the imposition of trading limits by the Exchange such that there are limits on the range within which the price of the relevant commodity may fluctuate in the prompt month and the closing or settlement price of such commodity on such day is at the upper or lower limit of that range; (f) a material change in the formula for or the method of determining the Floating Price; or (g) a material change in the content, composition or constitution of the relevant commodity. Greg Johnston 11/10/2000 12:41 PM To: John Zufferli/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: EOL Power Products Further to John's e-mail below, I do not believe that we need to build this type of language for alternative settlement into the long descriptions for financial power products, as both the form of ISDA and the GTC that we use for confirming financial transactions (which contain the legal terms and conditions that will govern Canadian EOL financial power transactions) contain market disruption provisions. These market disruption provisions provide the mechanism for determining the index price if the referenced price is unavailable or there is a material change in the formula or calculation of the referenced price, etc. I am just waiting to confirm with Mark Taylor that the on-line form of GTC applicable to financial transactions is the same as for the form used for transactions not entered into through EOL. Thanks Greg ---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT on 11/09/2000 01:47 PM --------------------------- John Zufferli 11/08/2000 08:09 AM To: Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: EOL Power Products We should add some language to the EOL power descriptions to include a mechanism for alternative settlement in the event that the power pool price of Alberta becomes defunct. I won't put any language in regarding market delay though. My intention is to trade this product whether I have a PPA or not.
|