Enron Mail

From:david.forster@enron.com
To:mark.taylor@enron.com
Subject:Re: Gross Error language
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Mon, 21 Aug 2000 11:48:00 -0700 (PDT)

I think we need for this to be reciprocal -although I agree the errors are=
=20
likely to be only our own.

Therefore, I suggest the following:

(f) Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement, any master agreement o=
r=20
any GTC to the contrary, any Transaction resulting from a Gross Error may =
be=20
voided and the parties agree that any such voided Transaction shall be of n=
o=20
force or effect. =01&Gross Error=018 shall mean the posting of any price t=
hat is=20
[5]% or more above or below then prevailing market prices, which difference=
=20
is verified by the average of quotations from three or more participants in=
=20
the relevant market for Transactions which would be conducted at the time o=
f=20
the Transaction containing the Gross Error. For a Transaction to qualify as=
=20
subject to Gross Error, one party must communicate by facsimile to the othe=
r=20
the claimed existence of Gross Error within [3] hours of the Transaction=20
occurring.=20


What do you think?

Dave




From: Mark Taylor@ECT on 08/14/2000 05:27 PM
To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: =20

Subject: Gross Error language

(f) Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement, any master agreement o=
r=20
any GTC to the contrary, any Transaction resulting from a Gross Error by=20
Enron shall be voided at Enron=01,s election and Counterparty agrees that a=
ny=20
such voided Transaction shall be of no force or effect. =01&Gross Error=01=
8 shall=20
mean the posting of any price that is [30]% or more above or below then=20
prevailing market prices, which difference is verified by the average of=20
quotations from three or more participants in the relevant market.