![]() |
Enron Mail |
Mark,
I am wondering if it is necessary to include a few more words in our index descriptors. When we refer to a published index, should we add: "including published corrections", or is this obvious enough? I'm thinking that if there is an error in the index which is acknowledged as such in the publication, then the error would be seen as something which should be corrected if we ever went to court. I'm also thinking that we would not want to apply this kind of language on a go-forward basis, as to have two different treatments might prejudice our position (although the UK office wishes to add this language on a go-forward) Thoughts? Dave
|