![]() |
Enron Mail |
I knew there was a reason we decided to go with "Lookalikes"!
Dave ---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/Corp/Enron on 12/05/2000 09:30 AM --------------------------- From: Enron London - EOL Product Control Group@ECT on 12/05/2000 07:58 AM Sent by: Lara Fields@ECT To: David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: Lookalike Naming Dave, After hearing of Mark Taylor's concerns on using 'Lookalike' in the short descriptions, we canvased the traders who would be affected (Metals and Liquids) to get their views. Below are Chris Mahoney's comments. Regards, Lara Chris Mahoney 02/12/2000 23:54 To: Enron London - EOL Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT cc: David Lilley/EU/Enron@Enron, Tim R Jones/EU/Enron@Enron, Neil Hussey/EU/Enron@Enron, James A Gordon/EU/Enron@Enron, Mark Jones/LON/ECT@ECT, Niamh Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Enron London - EOL Product Control Group/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Lookalike Naming They are futures being traded online and if we call them swaps that might confuse customers because in the oil market swaps are always considered to be full calender months and price out on a daily basis. for example if we have dec swap instead of dec lookalike that will have two different meanings to the mkt. the former be a full month swap with daily pricings and the latter being being a swap that has the same dates as the futures contract with a one day settlement. I think we would be making a mistake changing for these reasons.
|