![]() |
Enron Mail |
Mark, I heard earlier today that the resolution of this matter has been to
move confirmation/documentation to Calgary, but leave contract preparation and negotiation in Houston. I must admit disappoint with this bifurcated result, including for the following reasons: 1. It has left, rightly or (I trust) wrongly, the impression that there is concern as to the ability of the Canadian lawyers to documment and negotiate the ISDAs, etc. If this is the case, I do not share the concern. The legal group in Canada is strong, deep, conscientious, and regularly excels at greater and more complex challenges which expose Enron Canada to greater risks in physical trading, origination, finance and structured transactions. 2. For these reasons, the Canadian lawyers have the trust and confidence of the Canadian traders and originators, and their advice is sought and followed on all matters, including, frankly, financial trading. 3. This result ignores the practical realities of time, space, efficiency, legal jurisdictions, marketplace knowledge and internal and external relationships. 4. I feel that the we ought to have the opportunity to be exposed to, and be challenged by, all aspects of our business. In any event, please let me know who will be responsible for legal oversight of confirmation/documentation of financial transactions. For physical trading, we regularly advise on confirmation/documentation issues and, most notably, all structured trades and trades with a term of greater than one year are prepared and reviewed by Enron Canada legal. Regards, Peter.
|