![]() |
Enron Mail |
I think that the "general policies" route is the right (and only) one -
particularly for the vast number of reference entities envisaged. From a legal sign off perspective, we should be able to give the immediate all clear, provided in the case of a ref entity, that it is not an existing customer/counterparty of Enron (if it is we'll need to check confidentiality agreements etc). We'll need to work out the quickest way of establishing this (but it is not per se a legal task) in the case of a ref entity, that we have carried out the necessary the legal due diligence in its country of establishment/location in the case of a counterparty, that we have carried out the necessary legal due diligence in its country of establishment/location Of course our legal due diligence may require us to take additional steps in the case of some countries/counterparties, but we will address these steps as generically as possible. Hope this gives a sense of where we're coming from. Please call me to discuss further if need be. Paul Tomas Valnek 22/05/2000 10:44 To: Bryan Seyfried/LON/ECT@ECT cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, ECT London Credit Trading Subject: Re: Credit Trading - Approval Form I agree that the current Word document approval form will not be very practical once we scale up. Going forward, we could be looking at some kind of database solution as implemented for EnronOnline. TV Bryan Seyfried 20/05/2000 13:09 To: Tomas Valnek/LON/ECT@ECT cc: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, ECT London Credit Trading Subject: Re: Credit Trading - Approval Form Although this makes a lot of sense, how are going to implement it? We plan to scale massively and I cannot imagine that this will be efficient enough to facilitate the time frames and number of reference credits that we are anticipating. I think that we need to have a general policy that we can look to instead of approving them on a one off basis. Let's discuss Tomas Valnek 19/05/2000 11:42 To: ECT London Credit Trading, Denis O'Connell/LON/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Simons/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Credit Trading - Approval Form Attached is an Approval Form that will have to be completed to request if we want to trade with a new counterparty or on a new reference credit. I have incorporated comments from Origination, Credit and Legal. But should you have any further comments please let me know ASAP, as I plan to introduce this form by the middle of next week. (Note that there will be two forms, one for bankruptcy swaps and one for other credit derivatives.) Regards Tomas
|