|
|
Enron Mail |
Thanks Dave and looks good. Comments:
No. 5 -- Add that Enron is always the counterparty "bilateral" vs. "multilateral" on this platform No. 8 -- I can't read the titile, but does this show "Phone/other" compared to EOL? Can this be broken down individually for gas and for power? No. 9 -- Can Total life to date transactions and notational value be further broken out to show gas and power? No. 10 -- Blank No. 26/27 -- Can you add a statement that Enron "typically" "usually" etc. shows 2 ways with a brief explanation of what that means (ie, bids and offers). Also, can these slides be broken down to show gas and power individually within the total? Can you add a slide that discusses the limits on our EOL trading, such as Enron position limits set by board of directors, credit limits, trading limits and that trades down via conventional methods are included in these limits? Can you add a slide that lists other platforms -- for example, Dynegy, TrueQuote, HoustonStreet, ICE, etc. with a statement as to what they are (bilateral, multilateral) and who the owners are? Maggie--Linda Lawrence is putting together slides that shows Enron gas and power volume comparisions to total market. Can you add a several slides on why tighter spreads and liquidity and a well functioning market are beneficial for consumers. Any other comments? Thanks to all. From: David Forster/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/06/2001 11:34 AM To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: FERC Presentation Here is a copy of the presentation. Please note that the two slides at the end are not intended to be used unless needed to address a specific question. Dave
|